From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751391AbWCLFJn (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:09:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751389AbWCLFJn (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:09:43 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:56727 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751391AbWCLFJn (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:09:43 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:07:26 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Blazejowski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6 Message-Id: <20060311210726.17231319.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1142133933.19645.0.camel@blaze.homeip.net> References: <1142133933.19645.0.camel@blaze.homeip.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Blazejowski wrote: > > Are these UDMA transfer rates normal? > Please be less cryptic. What behaviour are you expecting to see? How does the current behaviour appear to be incorrect? What was the behaviour in previous kernels? (Which version?) What actual probelms are observable? Oops? Hang? Corruption? Nothing?