Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.]

Lee Revell
2006-03-14T17:36:56Z

On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 12:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> "we have just
> finished big&ugly memory trashing job, can we get our interactivity
> back"? Like I'd probably cron-scheduled it just after updatedb

The updatedb problem is STILL not solved? I remember someone proposed
years ago to have it use fcntl() or fadvise() to tell the kernel that we
are about to read every file on the system and to please not wipe the
cache - I guess this was never done?

Lee