From: Marr <marr@flex.com>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
marr@flex.com, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Readahead value 128K? (was Re: Drastic Slowdown of 'fseek()'
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:01:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603131501.38803.marr@flex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603131437.50461.a1426z@gawab.com>
On Monday 13 March 2006 6:37am, Al Boldi wrote:
> Marr wrote:
> > The 2.6.13 kernel on ReiserFS (without using
> > 'nolargeio=1' as a mount option) still takes about 4m35s to fseek 200,000
> > times on that 4MB file, even with 'hdparm -a0 /dev/hda' in effect.
>
> try this magic number:
>
> echo 192 > /sys/block/hda/queue/max_sectors_kb
> echo 192 > /sys/block/hda/queue/read_ahead_kb
>
> Anything outside 132-255 affects throughput negatively.
I tried this, but it seems that neither of these settings will take any value
over 128 (which is what they both started at before I tried to change them).
It seems that I can set values _lower_ than 128, but nothing higher (stock
Slackware 10.2 2.6.13 kernel).
> Also, can you dump hdparm -I /dev/hda?
Sure. Here's the results:
----------------------------------------
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: TOSHIBA MK2023GAS
Serial Number: 54594043T
Firmware Revision: MB001A
Standards:
Supported: 5 4 3 2
Likely used: 6
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 39070080
device size with M = 1024*1024: 19077 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 20003 MBytes (20 GB)
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
bytes avail on r/w long: 48 Queue depth: 1
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = ?
Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0080)
DMA: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* NOP cmd
* READ BUFFER cmd
* WRITE BUFFER cmd
* Host Protected Area feature set
* Look-ahead
* Write cache
* Power Management feature set
Security Mode feature set
SMART feature set
* Mandatory FLUSH CACHE command
* Device Configuration Overlay feature set
SET MAX security extension
* Advanced Power Management feature set
* SMART self-test
* SMART error logging
Security:
Master password revision code = 65534
supported
not enabled
not locked
frozen
not expired: security count
not supported: enhanced erase
24min for SECURITY ERASE UNIT.
HW reset results:
CBLID- above Vih
Device num = 0 determined by the jumper
Checksum: correct
----------------------------------------
I don't think anyone is implying this, but for the record, this problem is not
peculiar to this particular hard disk drive. I seem to see the problem on any
2.6.x kernel with a ReiserFS filesystem that has _not_ enabled the
(undocumented, as near as I can see) 'nolargeio=1' option on the mount.
Also, I haven't heard anything more after Hans Reiser queried Ulrich Drepper
about the 'glibc' angle on this problem, so I'm wondering if there's been any
progress on that front. Oh, I just noticed that Hans has re-pinged Ulrich on
this issue -- thanks, Hans!
Anway, as always, thanks to all who've contributed to this thread.
*** Please CC: me on replies -- I'm not subscribed.
Regards,
Bill Marr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-13 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 11:37 Readahead value 128K? (was Re: Drastic Slowdown of 'fseek()' Al Boldi
2006-03-13 20:01 ` Marr [this message]
2006-03-26 22:25 ` Marr
2006-03-27 18:50 ` Hans Reiser
2006-03-27 19:12 ` Marr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603131501.38803.marr@flex.com \
--to=marr@flex.com \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox