public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marr <marr@flex.com>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
	Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
	marr@flex.com, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Readahead value 128K? (was Re: Drastic Slowdown of 'fseek()'
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:01:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603131501.38803.marr@flex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603131437.50461.a1426z@gawab.com>

On Monday 13 March 2006 6:37am, Al Boldi wrote:
> Marr wrote:
> > The 2.6.13 kernel on ReiserFS (without using
> > 'nolargeio=1' as a mount option) still takes about 4m35s to fseek 200,000
> > times on that 4MB file, even with 'hdparm -a0 /dev/hda' in effect.
>
> try this magic number:
>
>         echo 192 > /sys/block/hda/queue/max_sectors_kb
>         echo 192 > /sys/block/hda/queue/read_ahead_kb
>
> Anything outside 132-255 affects throughput negatively.

I tried this, but it seems that neither of these settings will take any value 
over 128 (which is what they both started at before I tried to change them). 
It seems that I can set values _lower_ than 128, but nothing higher (stock 
Slackware 10.2 2.6.13 kernel).

> Also, can you dump hdparm -I /dev/hda?

Sure. Here's the results:

----------------------------------------

/dev/hda:

ATA device, with non-removable media
	Model Number:       TOSHIBA MK2023GAS                       
	Serial Number:      54594043T
	Firmware Revision:  MB001A  
Standards:
	Supported: 5 4 3 2 
	Likely used: 6
Configuration:
	Logical		max	current
	cylinders	16383	16383
	heads		16	16
	sectors/track	63	63
	--
	CHS current addressable sectors:   16514064
	LBA    user addressable sectors:   39070080
	device size with M = 1024*1024:       19077 MBytes
	device size with M = 1000*1000:       20003 MBytes (20 GB)
Capabilities:
	LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
	bytes avail on r/w long: 48	Queue depth: 1
	Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
	R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16	Current = ?
	Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0080)
	DMA: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 
	     Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
	PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 
	     Cycle time: no flow control=120ns  IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
	Enabled	Supported:
	   *	NOP cmd
	   *	READ BUFFER cmd
	   *	WRITE BUFFER cmd
	   *	Host Protected Area feature set
	   *	Look-ahead
	   *	Write cache
	   *	Power Management feature set
		Security Mode feature set
		SMART feature set
	   *	Mandatory FLUSH CACHE command 
	   *	Device Configuration Overlay feature set 
		SET MAX security extension
	   *	Advanced Power Management feature set
	   *	SMART self-test 
	   *	SMART error logging 
Security: 
	Master password revision code = 65534
		supported
	not	enabled
	not	locked
		frozen
	not	expired: security count
	not	supported: enhanced erase
	24min for SECURITY ERASE UNIT. 
HW reset results:
	CBLID- above Vih
	Device num = 0 determined by the jumper
Checksum: correct

----------------------------------------

I don't think anyone is implying this, but for the record, this problem is not 
peculiar to this particular hard disk drive. I seem to see the problem on any 
2.6.x kernel with a ReiserFS filesystem that has _not_ enabled the 
(undocumented, as near as I can see) 'nolargeio=1' option on the mount.

Also, I haven't heard anything more after Hans Reiser queried Ulrich Drepper 
about the 'glibc' angle on this problem, so I'm wondering if there's been any 
progress on that front. Oh, I just noticed that Hans has re-pinged Ulrich on 
this issue -- thanks, Hans!

Anway, as always, thanks to all who've contributed to this thread.

*** Please CC: me on replies -- I'm not subscribed.

Regards,
Bill Marr

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-13 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-13 11:37 Readahead value 128K? (was Re: Drastic Slowdown of 'fseek()' Al Boldi
2006-03-13 20:01 ` Marr [this message]
2006-03-26 22:25   ` Marr
2006-03-27 18:50     ` Hans Reiser
2006-03-27 19:12       ` Marr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200603131501.38803.marr@flex.com \
    --to=marr@flex.com \
    --cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
    --cc=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox