From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
j4K3xBl4sT3r <jakexblaster@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:01:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060313190109.GC13973@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1142275289.13256.1.camel@mindpipe>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:41:27PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:27 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > # latencies up to 80% slower
>
> This is certainly bullshit, it has not been true since 2.6.7 or so.
>
> Did not visit the page but that list smells like they are selling
> something.
The might be issues already fixed in 2.6.15 (he tested the then-current
2.6.11.7) or there might be powerpc specific problems, but after a quick
look at this page it looks like a serious page.
He also posted the complete lmbench results, dmesg's and .config's at
his page, and from a first view I'd say he has very well documented
what and how he measured.
> Lee
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-13 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 0:40 Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 8:00 ` Lexington Luthor
2006-03-15 1:35 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 1:46 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-13 8:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 18:03 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-13 18:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-14 6:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-14 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-14 8:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 9:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 15:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-16 15:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 10:03 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-14 22:21 ` Russell King
2006-03-15 0:46 ` Grant Coady
[not found] ` <20060315080313.GC3166@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-03-15 9:37 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 22:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-15 23:32 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-16 4:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 8:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 8:31 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-16 8:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 9:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 2:55 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-03-13 18:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-13 18:41 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-13 19:01 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-03-14 0:18 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 19:08 ` Diego Calleja
2006-03-13 22:00 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-13 22:01 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 22:20 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-13 22:33 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-16 12:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 22:25 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 3:53 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 22:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-15 23:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-16 13:39 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060313190109.GC13973@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jakexblaster@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox