From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
To: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:20:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060314065022.GA5748@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <441645FB.6000002@watson.ibm.com>
> Lee's point is valid....we should be doing the set_normalized_timespec.
>
Semantically that sounds correct. But the intension of the caller as in
our case could be to convert the timespec to nsec_t. Calling
set_normalized_timespec() might be an overhead in this case.
Balbir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-14 0:40 [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:42 ` [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 1:01 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 1:05 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 1:12 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 3:42 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-14 4:26 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 6:50 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2006-03-15 10:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-15 10:28 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-14 0:45 ` Patch 2/9] Initialization Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 10:54 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-03-14 15:20 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-15 10:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-15 12:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-15 15:53 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:47 ` [Patch 3/9] Block I/O accounting initialization Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-15 10:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-15 16:27 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:48 ` [Patch 4/9] Block I/O accounting collection Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:51 ` [Patch 5/9] Swapin delays Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:53 ` [Patch 7/9] /proc interface for all I/O delays Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:55 ` [Patch 8/9] generic netlink utility functions Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-26 16:44 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-26 17:06 ` jamal
2006-03-14 0:56 ` [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 2:29 ` jamal
2006-03-14 2:33 ` Matt Helsley
2006-03-14 2:48 ` jamal
2006-03-14 4:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-22 7:49 ` [RFC][UPDATED PATCH 2.6.16] " Balbir Singh
2006-03-23 14:04 ` jamal
2006-03-23 15:41 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 14:04 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:54 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 1:19 ` jamal
2006-03-25 9:41 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 12:52 ` jamal
2006-03-25 15:36 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 17:48 ` jamal
2006-03-25 18:22 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-26 14:05 ` jamal
2006-03-26 16:40 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 1:32 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 14:11 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:19 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:59 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-14 4:29 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 1:01 ` [Patch 6/9] cpu delay collection Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 19:28 ` [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting Greg KH
2006-03-14 20:49 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 21:24 ` Greg KH
2006-03-14 21:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-23 15:16 ` [Patch 0/9] Performance Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-25 2:38 ` Greg KH
2006-03-27 18:28 ` Shailabh Nagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060314065022.GA5748@in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox