From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Tong Li <tongli@cs.duke.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bursty I/O in ext3
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:29:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060314152952.GA5644@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0603140150420.1352@eenie.cs.duke.edu>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:32:17AM -0500, Tong Li wrote:
> I'm running kernbench (make -j 128 on a kernel source) back to back
> multiple times on an SMP. Among every 10 runs, there's always at least one
> run that has a run time around 40% longer than the other runs. (Before
> kernbench starts timing, it does a sync.) 'vmstat 1' indicates that the
> longer runs always have a couple of 1-sec intervals during which there are
> 10 times more block-outs (bo field) than the average traffic in the rest
> of the run, and during these intervals, many cc1 processes are in the D
> state. My file system is ext3 and all the things like journal commit
> interval, pdflush interval, etc. have the default values.
>
> I'm trying to understand why such variability occurs. I tested the same
> thing with ext2 and did not see any variability. So I'm thinking about two
> things: (1) for some reason, ext3/jbd occasionally issues a large volume
> of bursty writes to the disk (but why does it occur just sometimes, not
> always?), and (2) when there are bursty writes, the block device driver is
> not able to handle them, causing I/O waits. But I don't really have a
> clear understanding of the problem here...
If you are using an e2fsprogs older than version 1.38, you should try
expanding the journal size from the default of 32M to 128M; with the
filesystem unmounted do:
tune2fs -O ^has_journal /dev/hdXX
tune2fs -O has_journal -J journal_size=128 /dev/hdXX
If the journal gets full and the filesystem has to do a forced journal
truncate, that can cause I/O's to stall and writes can thus get bursty
with performance becoming nasty as a result. Increasing the journal
size can avoid this, at the cost of potentially having more disk
buffers be pinned in memory, thus increasing the overhead of
unswappable kernel memory.
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-14 7:32 Bursty I/O in ext3 Tong Li
2006-03-14 15:29 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2006-03-14 21:51 ` Tong Li
2006-03-14 16:46 ` Avishay Traeger
2006-03-14 21:52 ` Tong Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060314152952.GA5644@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tongli@cs.duke.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox