From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.16-rc6 patch] remove sleep_avg multiplier
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:05:37 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603142105.38225.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060314095654.GA8756@elte.hu>
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 20:56, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > The patchlet below removes the sleep_avg multiplier. This multiplier
> > was necessary back when we had 10 seconds of dynamic range in sleep_avg,
> > but now that we only have one second, it causes that one second to be
> > compressed down to 100ms in some cases. This is particularly noticeable
> > when compiling a kernel in a slow NFS mount, and I believe it to be a
> > very likely candidate for other recently reported network related
> > interactivity problems.
> >
> > In testing, I can detect no negative impact of this removal. IMHO, this
> > constitutes a bug-fix, and as such is suitable for 2.6.16.
> looks good to me. The biggest complaint against the current scheduler is
> over-eager interactivity boosting - this patch moderates that in a
> smooth way.
I actually think Mike is right about the change, but has anyone else tested
this patch to also confirm "it has no negative impact" warranting it's rapid
inclusion in 2.6.16?
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-14 9:51 [2.6.16-rc6 patch] remove sleep_avg multiplier Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-14 10:05 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-03-14 10:10 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 11:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 12:07 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 12:29 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:36 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 12:47 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:59 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603142105.38225.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox