From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.16-rc6 patch] remove sleep_avg multiplier
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:10:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603142110.37017.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603142105.38225.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 21:05, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 20:56, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > The patchlet below removes the sleep_avg multiplier. This multiplier
> > > was necessary back when we had 10 seconds of dynamic range in
> > > sleep_avg, but now that we only have one second, it causes that one
> > > second to be compressed down to 100ms in some cases. This is
> > > particularly noticeable when compiling a kernel in a slow NFS mount,
> > > and I believe it to be a very likely candidate for other recently
> > > reported network related interactivity problems.
> > >
> > > In testing, I can detect no negative impact of this removal. IMHO,
> > > this constitutes a bug-fix, and as such is suitable for 2.6.16.
> >
> > looks good to me. The biggest complaint against the current scheduler is
> > over-eager interactivity boosting - this patch moderates that in a
> > smooth way.
>
> I actually think Mike is right about the change, but has anyone else tested
> this patch to also confirm "it has no negative impact" warranting it's
> rapid inclusion in 2.6.16?
/me smacks himself for misusing "it's"
How about an interbench run before and after Mike?
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-14 9:51 [2.6.16-rc6 patch] remove sleep_avg multiplier Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-14 10:05 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 10:10 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-03-14 11:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 12:07 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 12:29 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:36 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 12:47 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:59 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603142110.37017.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox