From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
olel@ans.pl, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
rajesh.shah@intel.com, ak@muc.de
Subject: Re: More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:44:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060315054416.GF3205@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060313150435.A26689@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Ashok Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:22:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > And does it affect pretend-x86-hotplug, or is it only affecting real hotplug?
> >
> its no more pretend-x86, in the past we used to put the cpu in idle(),
> now we do put the cpu in halt and bring back by another startup ipi, just like
> boot sequence, both for x86 and x86_64.
That's actually broken since 2.6.14 (at least on my P3 box); please
see:
Subject: i386 cpu hotplug bug - instant reboot when onlining secondary
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/19/186
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-15 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-12 2:04 More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 11:04 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 11:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 13:05 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 15:35 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2006-03-12 21:13 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 19:36 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 20:05 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 22:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 23:04 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-15 5:44 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-03-15 6:18 ` Shaohua Li
2006-03-15 7:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 9:37 ` [PATCH] No need to protect current->group_info in sys_getgroups(), in_group_p() and in_egroup_p() Eric Dumazet
2006-03-20 19:09 ` [PATCH] Use unsigned int types for a faster bsearch Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 5:06 ` [PATCH] Use __read_mostly on some hot fs variables Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 5:15 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-22 6:23 ` [RFC, PATCH] avoid some atomics in open()/close() for monothreaded processes Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-22 6:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 7:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 18:09 ` More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Ashok Raj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-15 10:50 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-15 15:44 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060315054416.GF3205@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olel@ans.pl \
--cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox