public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fastboot mailing list <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Morton Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Expanding the size of "start" and "end" field in "struct resource"
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:08:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060315220812.GA28485@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060315193114.GA7465@in.ibm.com>

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:31:14PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is there a reason why "start" and "end" field of "struct resource" are of
> type unsigned long. My understanding is that "struct resource" can be used
> to represent any system resource including physical memory. But unsigned
> long is not suffcient to represent memory more than 4GB on PAE systems. 

As Kumar has stated, people have tried to do this in the past.  Please
search the archives for the problems that will happen when you change
this.

I agree it should be fixed, but if you want to do this, you need to
audit a _lot_ of kernel code and fix it up everywhere.  Please start
with the old patches posted to lkml in the past and work from there.

good luck,

greg k-h

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-15 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-15 19:31 [RFC][PATCH] Expanding the size of "start" and "end" field in "struct resource" Vivek Goyal
2006-03-15 19:48 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 19:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-15 20:01   ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 20:10     ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 20:13     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 20:28       ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 20:37         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 20:32       ` Vivek Goyal
2006-03-15 20:58         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:57   ` David S. Miller
2006-03-15 20:53 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-15 21:05   ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 21:13     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-15 21:29       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:28         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-15 21:50           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 22:13             ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 22:18               ` David S. Miller
2006-03-15 21:59           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 22:07             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-16 14:45               ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:30       ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 21:35         ` hackmiester / Hunter Fuller
2006-03-15 21:31       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:15     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:26     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-15 21:37       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 22:08 ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060315220812.GA28485@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox