From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
j4K3xBl4sT3r <jakexblaster@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:10:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060315231029.GF4454@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0603152355460.20859@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:57:12PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> >On another denx.de page I found this summary (so you do not have to
> >visit the page):
> ># slow to build: 2.6 takes 30...40% longer to compile
>
> A side effect of all the new optimizations that went into gcc since 2.95,
> I would say.
If you would have had a quick look at the results on the webpage you are
commenting on instead of blindly speculating, you'd have known that your
statement is bullshit since both the 2.4 and the 2.6 compiles were done
using gcc 3.3.3.
> Jan Engelhardt
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-15 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 0:40 Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 8:00 ` Lexington Luthor
2006-03-15 1:35 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 1:46 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-13 8:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 18:03 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-13 18:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-14 6:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-14 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-14 8:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 9:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 15:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-16 15:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 10:03 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-14 22:21 ` Russell King
2006-03-15 0:46 ` Grant Coady
[not found] ` <20060315080313.GC3166@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-03-15 9:37 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 22:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-15 23:32 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-16 4:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 8:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 8:31 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-16 8:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 9:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 2:55 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-03-13 18:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-13 18:41 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-13 19:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-14 0:18 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 19:08 ` Diego Calleja
2006-03-13 22:00 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-13 22:01 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 22:20 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-13 22:33 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-16 12:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 22:25 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 3:53 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 22:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-15 23:10 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-03-16 13:39 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060315231029.GF4454@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jakexblaster@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox