public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: swsusp_suspend continues?
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:19:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060316091943.GD1729@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603161320.36051.kernel@kolivas.org>

On Čt 16-03-06 13:20:35, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Hi Pavel
> 
> I've been playing with hooking in the post resume swap prefetch code into 
> swsusp_suspend and just started noting this on 2.6.16-rc6-mm1:
> During the _suspend_ to disk cycle on this machine the swsusp_suspend function 
> appears to continue beyond swsusp_arch_suspend as I get the same messages 
> that I would normally get during a resume cycle such as this:
> 
> Suspending device platform
> swsusp: Need to copy 14852 pages
> Intel machine check architecture supported.
> Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0
> and...
> eth1: Coming out of suspend...
> and so on
> 
> but then it manages to write to disk and power down anyway. Is this correct? 

Yes. We need our hardware enabled for image write (disk would be
enough), so we resume it (and we resume all of it, because that was
easier to code).

> If I put post_resume_swap_prefetch at the end of swsusp_suspend it hits that 
> function on both resume _and_ suspend cycles. Am I missing something?

No. That's just the way it is. See

        /* Restore control flow magically appears here */

and 

        /* Code below is only ever reached in case of failure. Otherwise
         * execution continues at place where swsusp_arch_suspend was called
         */
        BUG_ON(!error);

Yes, I agree it is confusing, and feel free to suggest comment cleanups.

I'd suggest you hook at disk.c:pm_suspend_disk.

Or just include that /sys interface, and trigger it from userspace
just after resume. Actually I like that best. It is optional, it can
be triggered from userspace, and you will not have to deal with
suspend internals.

(And it will be useful to uswsusp, too, that avoids big chunks of
in-kernel suspend code).

								Pavel
-- 
133:

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-16  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-10 17:04 Faster resuming of suspend technology Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-11  7:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-11 12:17   ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-11 12:46     ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-12  9:26       ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-12 17:54         ` Jim Crilly
2006-03-12 23:06           ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-20 12:45             ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-21 11:33               ` Fwd: " Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-27 23:57                 ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-28  0:28                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28 12:48                     ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2006-03-12 21:32 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-12 22:30   ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-13  1:43     ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-13 10:12       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 11:10         ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-14 10:32           ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 10:06   ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 10:35     ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-13 10:43       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 11:13         ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-13 11:36           ` does swsusp suck aftre resume for you? [was Re: [ck] Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.] Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 12:03             ` does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was " Con Kolivas
2006-03-14  5:13               ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14  8:24                 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-14 11:51                 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-14 12:33                   ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:43                     ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-14 17:36                   ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 21:34                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 18:06               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-14 21:45                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-15 10:37             ` does swsusp suck aftre resume for you? [was " Stefan Seyfried
2006-03-15 17:59               ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-15 21:32                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-16 10:33                 ` does swsusp suck after resume for you? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:46                   ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 10:47                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:50                       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 21:33                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 21:44                           ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 22:15                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-17  4:28                             ` [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks was: " Con Kolivas
2006-03-17  4:46                               ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-17  6:17                                 ` [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks 2 Con Kolivas
2006-03-17 17:31                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-18  4:14                                     ` [PATCH][RFC] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:41                                       ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  4:46                                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:52                                           ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  4:56                                             ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  5:44                                               ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  6:14                                                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  8:30                                                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  9:40                                                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:55                     ` [ck] Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Andreas Mohr
2006-03-17  5:23                     ` 2.6.16-rc6: swsusp cannot find swap partition Mark Lord
2006-03-17  5:34                       ` Mark Lord
2006-03-16 11:31                   ` [ck] Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16  2:20               ` swsusp_suspend continues? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16  9:19                 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-03-16 16:12                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060316091943.GD1729@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox