public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Takashi Sato <sho@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:53:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060316135341.GB24013@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02bc01c648f2$bd35e830$4168010a@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp>

On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:11:17PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
> >You changed most of the affected variables from "int" to "unsigned int",
> >that seems allow block number to address 2^32. It probably a good thing
> >to consider change the variables to sector_t type, so when the time we
> >want to support for 64 bit block number, we don't have to re-do the
> >similar work again.  Laurent did very similar work on this before.
> 
> sector_t is 8bytes on normal configuration and there are many
> variables for blocks on ext2/3.  I thought extending variables may
> influence on performance, so I didn't change.

It would be interesting to do a CPU overhead benchmark to see how much
of the overhead is actually measurable on an x86 system.  If it's only
a small percent, it might be acceptable given that x86_64 machines are
going to be gradually taking over, and sector_t only exists if
CONFIG_LBD is enabled.  So for smaller systems where LBD isn't
enabled, we won't see performance overhead since sector_t won't exist
and so the code is going to have to use a typedef for ext2_blk_t which
is either __u32 or sector_t as necessary.

> >- The superblock format currently stores the number of block groups as a
> >16-bit integer, and because (on a 4 KB blocksize filesystem) the maximum
> >number of blocks in a block group is 32,768 , a combination of these
> >constraints limits the maximum size of the filesystem to 8 TB
> 
> Is it s_block_group_nr in ext3_super_block?
> mke2fs sets 65535 to the field if the number of block groups is greater
> than 65535.  Current kernel ignores the field and re-calculate from
> other fields.  findsuper command is the only user of it and it simply prints
> the value.  So, it does not limit the maximum size of the filesystem to 8 
> TB.

s_block_group_nr is *not* the number of block groups in the
filesystem.  As Takashi-san properly pointed out, the kernel
calculates the number of block groups by dividing the number of blocks
by the blocks_per_group fields.  s_block_group_nr is used to identify
the block group of a particular backup supeblock.  

So for the backup superblock located at block group #3,
s_block_group_nr 3, and for the backup superblock located at block
group #5, s_block_group_nr 5, and so on.  It is used only as a hint so
that prorams like findsuper and gpart can be more intelligent about
finding the start of filesystem, when trying to recover from a smashed
partition table.

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-16 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-15 12:39 [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel) Takashi Sato
2006-03-15 12:56 ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-03-16  2:19 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-16 12:11   ` Takashi Sato
2006-03-16 13:53     ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2006-03-16 18:35     ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-16 21:26       ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-03-16 22:59         ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-18 17:07           ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-03-20  6:36             ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-20 22:38               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-03-20 23:48                 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-21 17:05                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-03-21 18:38                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-03-21 19:47                       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-03-21 20:40                         ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-21 20:16                       ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2006-03-21 23:05                       ` Olivier Galibert
2006-03-21 23:35                         ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2006-03-25 14:51                       ` cascardo
2006-03-26 16:27                         ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-27 19:59                           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-03-27 20:36                           ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2006-03-27 19:55                         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-03-27 20:05                           ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2006-03-27 20:40                             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-03-28  0:14                           ` cascardo
2006-03-21 20:26                     ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-21  4:03                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-03-17  9:35       ` Laurent Vivier
2006-03-19  2:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-03-20 10:11   ` Takashi Sato
2006-03-26  3:01     ` Theodore Ts'o
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-26 22:15 Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060316135341.GB24013@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sho@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox