public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: Mark Maule <maule@sgi.com>,
	"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	shaohua.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:47:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060316234705.GA24527@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adalkvaneq5.fsf@cisco.com>

On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:37:22PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Greg> As msi.c today is pretty platform-specific as is, I don't
>     Greg> have a problem with moving the ia64 stuff also into that
>     Greg> directory.  Especially as it will help solve issues like
>     Greg> this a lot better.
> 
> I think we really want to make drivers/pci/msi.c less
> platform-specific.  Both powerpc and sparc64 are starting to pay
> attention to MSI, so we should really be trying to move things in the
> direction of a clean separation of generic MSI handling and
> Intel-specific bits.

Oh I completely agree.  It's just that the efforts so far to do this has
caused a big #include mess that we are currently in.  And I don't think
that putting pci core structures in the include/linux/ directory is the
correct solution.  If others can come up with cleaner splits of the
code, I incourage it.

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-16 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-14 21:01 [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-14 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-14 21:59   ` Greg KH
2006-03-14 22:25     ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-15  0:51   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-15 23:55     ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 15:19       ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-16 18:19         ` Mark Maule
2006-03-16 19:32           ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-16 19:41             ` Mark Maule
2006-03-16 23:28               ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:37                 ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-16 23:45                   ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-16 23:47                   ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-03-16 23:41           ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-16 23:49             ` Greg KH
2006-03-17  0:41               ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-17  1:18                 ` Mark Maule
2006-03-16 15:29       ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-14 21:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-14 23:55   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-15  0:09     ` Mark Maule
2006-03-15  1:04       ` Jun'ichi Nomura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060316234705.GA24527@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maule@sgi.com \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox