From: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
ericvh@hera.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, ericvh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] Re: [RESEND][PATCH] v9fs: print v9fs module address
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:59:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060318015932.GA2121@ionkov.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060317130311.0477454f.akpm@osdl.org>
Yes, it looks like funciton_name+0xoffset is enough for debugging. We can
even calculate the module address if we need it.
You can ignore the patch.
Thanks,
Lucho
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 01:03:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton said:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 07:09:14PM +0000, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH] print v9fs module address
> > > From: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>
> > > Date: 1141313037 -0500
> > >
> > > This patch prints v9fs module address when the module is initialized. It is
> > > useful to have it in the logs -- if the kernel crashes the address can be
> > > used together with the oops print to find out the exact place (presumably in
> > > the v9fs code) that cause the oops.
> >
> > NACK.
> >
> > This just clutters the log. The information is provided in /proc/modules
> > for all modules.
>
> But it's not printed out in an oops record and it can be hard to read
> /proc/modules when the kernel is dead.
>
> That being said...
>
> If we really want this info then it should be printed out by the oops code,
> where it prints the names of all the loaded modules - add "(0xc0123456)"
> after each module name.
>
> But I can't say I've ever felt a need for this feature - the symbolic info
> in the oops trace tells you function_name+0xoffset/0xsize [*] which is
> sufficient info for debugging.
>
> IOW: what's the use case here, Eric?
>
>
>
> [*] unless it's x86_64, which randomly prints some of these things in
> decimal or sanskrit or something.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> V9fs-developer mailing list
> V9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/v9fs-developer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-18 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-17 19:09 [RESEND][PATCH] v9fs: print v9fs module address Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-03-17 19:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-17 21:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18 1:59 ` Latchesar Ionkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060318015932.GA2121@ionkov.net \
--to=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=ericvh@hera.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox