From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932265AbWCRIfe (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:35:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932300AbWCRIfe (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:35:34 -0500 Received: from linuxwireless.org.ve.carpathiahost.net ([66.117.45.234]:58057 "EHLO linuxwireless.org.ve.carpathiahost.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932265AbWCRIfe (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:35:34 -0500 From: "Alejandro Bonilla" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Dual Core on Linux questions Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 02:35:33 -0600 Message-Id: <20060318082434.M33432@linuxwireless.org> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.40 20040816 X-OriginatingIP: 200.91.94.134 (abonilla@linuxwireless.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I have a few questions about the PM Dual Core and how could it really work with Linux. Sorry if there are new patches on LKML about any of these things: Could each processor or die, have it's own cpufreq scaling governor? Is there a way to allow one die to be idle and let the other one normal? So in other words, could we manage these processors speedstep, utilization and workload individually? Thanks! .Alejandro