From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751068AbWCRW00 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:26:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751092AbWCRW00 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:26:26 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.192.83]:61119 "EHLO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751068AbWCRW0Z convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:26:25 -0500 From: Parag Warudkar To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:26:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk, jun.nakajima@intel.com, Dave Jones References: <200603181525.14127.kernel-stuff@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603181726.26311.kernel-stuff@comcast.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 18 March 2006 16:40, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Anyway, I _think_ it's this one: > >                 for_each_online_cpu(j) { >                         dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, j); >                         requested_freq[j] = dbs_info->cur_policy->cur; >                 } > > where dbs_info->cur_policy seems to be NULL. Maybe. That was right on target. I just put a check in the code which confirms that for some reason cur_policy for cpu0 is NULL. Parag