From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751232AbWCSCah (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:30:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751260AbWCSCah (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:30:37 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:38113 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751232AbWCSCah (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:30:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:30:33 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: + cpumask-uninline-first_cpu.patch added to -mm tree Message-Id: <20060318183033.e1eb46b4.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <200603190214.k2J2EAUx022646@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <200603190214.k2J2EAUx022646@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.7 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Whoah - how come you are doing this by adding out of line cpumask functions, instead of out of line bitmap functions, wrapped for both cpumask and nodemask ? There should be no need for a lib/cpumask.c file. (I predict your response will be "show me the code" ;). -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401