From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [2.6.16-rc6 patch] fix interactive task starvation
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:15:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603181915.48098.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060318000549.4bb35800.akpm@osdl.org>
On Saturday 18 March 2006 19:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > The patch below fixes a starvation problem that occurs when a stream of
> > highly interactive tasks delay an array switch for extended periods
> > despite EXPIRED_STARVING(rq) being true. AFAIKT, the only choice is to
> > enqueue awakening tasks on the expired array in this case.
> >
> > Without this patch, it can be nearly impossible to remotely login to a
> > busy server, and interactive shell commands can starve for minutes.
> >
> > This has not been verified by anyone. Comments?
>
> What does that question mean, btw?
He's waiting for me to say I don't like it. But I do like it.
> -mm is looking like linux-2.6.38 at present so of course things got tangled
> up - sched-activate-sched-batch-expired.patch modifies __activate_task().
>
> I ended up with the below.
>
> Which do we think is more likely to be true - batch_task(p) or
> expired_starving(rq)? batch_task() looks cheaper to evaluate so I put that
> first. But I guess it's less likely to be true. hmm.
Depends entirely on workload so it's impossible to predict in advance. Any
order will do I suspect.
> + if (unlikely(batch_task(p) || expired_starving(rq)))
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-18 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-18 5:08 [2.6.16-rc6 patch] fix interactive task starvation Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18 5:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18 5:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18 6:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18 7:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18 7:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18 7:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18 7:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-18 8:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18 8:15 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-03-18 9:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603181915.48098.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox