From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030565AbWCTWLq (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:11:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030573AbWCTWJi (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:09:38 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:63710 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030566AbWCTWIx (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:08:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:05:34 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Alasdair G Kergon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: dm: bio split bvec fix Message-Id: <20060320140534.1feeccca.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060320192155.GU4724@agk.surrey.redhat.com> References: <20060320192155.GU4724@agk.surrey.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > > The code that handles bios that span table target boundaries by breaking > them up into smaller bios will not split an individual struct bio_vec > into more than two pieces. Sometimes more than that are required. > > This patch adds a loop to break the second piece up into as many > pieces as are necessary. Should this go into 2.6.16.1?