From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.16
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:58:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060320235846.GA84147@dspnet.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060320212338.GA11571@kroah.com>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:23:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> They are the same "delete devfs" patches that I submitted for 2.6.12 and
> 2.6.13 and 2.6.14 and 2.6.15. It rips out all of devfs from the kernel
> and ends up saving a lot of space. Since 2.6.13 came out, I have seen
> no complaints about the fact that devfs was not able to be enabled
> anymore, and in fact, a lot of different subsystems have already been
> deleting devfs support for a while now, with apparently no complaints
> (due to the lack of users.)
I'm an occasional user. I'm just able to add a config entry by hand.
Devfs for block devices is required for the fedora core 3 install
kernel. I haven't checked whether fc4 needs it too (DaveJ?), but if
it is the case it would be a real bad idea to remove it before fc6 is
out.
I know, I know, compatibility is for the weak.
OG.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-20 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-20 21:23 [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.16 Greg KH
2006-03-20 21:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-20 21:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-03-20 21:40 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-20 22:02 ` Greg KH
2006-03-20 23:58 ` Olivier Galibert [this message]
2006-03-21 0:05 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-21 7:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-21 12:47 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-03-23 3:33 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2006-03-23 21:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-28 22:30 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060320235846.GA84147@dspnet.fr.eu.org \
--to=galibert@pobox.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox