From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux@dominikbrodowski.de
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] cpufreq_conservative: update and align of codebase
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:22:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060322012210.1c0fb11f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060322085807.GA10689@inskipp.digriz.org.uk>
Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk> wrote:
>
> *NEW* patches, for kernel 2.6.16
>
> Something I had been meaning to do for a while. The codebases between
> ondemand and conservative have strayed and as Venkatesh has far more Clue(tm)
> than I am going to adjust my code to look more like his :)
>
> Another reason to do this is ages ago, knowingly, I did a piss poor attempt
> at making conservative less responsive by knocking up
> DEF_SAMPLING_RATE_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER by two orders of magnitude. I did fix
> this ages ago but in my dis-organisation I must have toasted the diff and
> left it the way it was. About two weeks ago a user contacted me saying he
> was having problems with the conservative governor with his AMD Athlon XP-M
> 2800+ as /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative showed
> sampling_rate_min 9950000
> sampling_rate_max 1360065408
>
> Nine seconds to decide about changing the frequency....not too responsive :)
umm, that's not really a changelog. Please, see
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt. Section 2a is
relevant too..
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-22 8:58 [patch 1/4] cpufreq_conservative: update and align of codebase Alexander Clouter
2006-03-22 9:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060322012210.1c0fb11f.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alex@digriz.org.uk \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox