From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: virtualization@lists.osdl.org
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>,
Dan Arai <arai@vmware.com>, Anne Holler <anne@vmware.com>,
Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@vmware.com>,
Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>,
Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@ira.uka.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Rik Van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@vmware.com>,
Jack Lo <jlo@vmware.com>, Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@novell.com>,
Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>,
Leendert van Doorn <leendert@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 19/24] i386 Vmi mmu changes
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603222120.06145.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603131813.k2DIDo1g005760@zach-dev.vmware.com>
On Monday 13 March 2006 19:13, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> MMU code movement. Unfortunately, this one is a little bit more
> complicated than the rest. We have to override the default accessors
> that directly write to page table entries. Because of the 2/3-level
> PAE split in Linux, this turned out to be really ugly at first, but
> by allowing the sub-arch layer to override the definitions and keeping
> the native definitions in place, the code becomes much cleaner.
This patch definitely needs to be split up more.
-Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 18:13 [RFC, PATCH 19/24] i386 Vmi mmu changes Zachary Amsden
2006-03-22 20:20 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603222120.06145.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anne@vmware.com \
--cc=arai@vmware.com \
--cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jlo@vmware.com \
--cc=jreddy@vmware.com \
--cc=jtl@ira.uka.de \
--cc=kmacy@fsmware.com \
--cc=ksrinivasan@novell.com \
--cc=leendert@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pratap@vmware.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox