public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 6) - Update Documentation/pci.txt
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:24:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060324162458.GA4206@colo.lackof.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44238469.8080009@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:32:25PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> This patch adds the description about legacy I/O port free driver into
> Documentation/pci.txt.

I very much appreciate Kenji has pursued this.
I edited much of the original text and wrote some parts
of the "MMIO Write Posting" chapter.  Errors in those
bits are most likely mine.

Please add my S-o-B line to the commit log in case the
language needs further editing. I already see one typo
("to CPU continue" -> "the CPU to continue") and will
submit a patch if anyone has more.

thanks,
grant

Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>


> Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
>  Documentation/pci.txt |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.16-mm1/Documentation/pci.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-mm1.orig/Documentation/pci.txt	2006-03-23 20:04:06.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.16-mm1/Documentation/pci.txt	2006-03-23 20:04:12.000000000 +0900
> @@ -269,3 +269,70 @@
>  pci_find_device()		Superseded by pci_get_device()
>  pci_find_subsys()		Superseded by pci_get_subsys()
>  pci_find_slot()			Superseded by pci_get_slot()
> +
> +
> +9. Legacy I/O port free driver
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +Large servers may not be able to provide I/O port resources to all PCI
> +devices. I/O Port space is only 64KB on Intel Architecture[1] and is
> +likely also fragmented since the I/O base register of PCI-to-PCI
> +bridge will usually be aligned to a 4KB boundary[2]. On such systems,
> +pci_enable_device() and pci_request_regions() will fail when
> +attempting to enable I/O Port regions that don't have I/O Port
> +resources assigned.
> +
> +Fortunately, many PCI devices which request I/O Port resources also
> +provide access to the same registers via MMIO BARs. These devices can
> +be handled without using I/O port space and the drivers typically
> +offer a CONFIG_ option to only use MMIO regions
> +(e.g. CONFIG_TULIP_MMIO). PCI devices typically provide I/O port
> +interface for legacy OSs and will work when I/O port resources are not
> +assigned. The "PCI Local Bus Specification Revision 3.0" discusses
> +this on p.44, "IMPLEMENTATION NOTE".
> +
> +If your PCI device driver doesn't need I/O port resources assigned to
> +I/O Port BARs, you should use pci_enable_device_bars() instead of
> +pci_enable_device() in order not to enable I/O port regions for the
> +corresponding devices.
> +
> +[1] Some systems support 64KB I/O port space per PCI segment.
> +[2] Some PCI-to-PCI bridges support optional 1KB aligned I/O base.
> +
> +
> +10. MMIO Space and "Write Posting"
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +Converting a driver from using I/O Port space to using MMIO space
> +often requires some additional changes. Specifically, "write posting"
> +needs to be handled. Most drivers (e.g. tg3, acenic, sym53c8xx_2)
> +already do. I/O Port space guarantees write transactions reach the PCI
> +device before the CPU can continue. Writes to MMIO space allow to CPU
> +continue before the transaction reaches the PCI device. HW weenies
> +call this "Write Posting" because the write completion is "posted" to
> +the CPU before the transaction has reached it's destination.
> +
> +Thus, timing sensitive code should add readl() where the CPU is
> +expected to wait before doing other work.  The classic "bit banging"
> +sequence works fine for I/O Port space:
> +
> +	for (i=8; --i; val >>= 1) {
> +		outb(val & 1, ioport_reg);	/* write bit */
> +		udelay(10);
> +	}
> +
> +The same sequence for MMIO space should be:
> +
> +	for (i=8; --i; val >>= 1) {
> +		writeb(val & 1, mmio_reg);	/* write bit */
> +		readb(safe_mmio_reg);		/* flush posted write */
> +		udelay(10);
> +	}
> +
> +It is important that "safe_mmio_reg" not have any side effects that
> +interferes with the correct operation of the device.
> +
> +Another case to watch out for is when resetting a PCI device. Use PCI
> +Configuration space reads to flush the writel(). This will gracefully
> +handle the PCI master abort on all platforms if the PCI device is
> +expected to not respond to a readl().  Most x86 platforms will allow
> +MMIO reads to master abort (aka "Soft Fail") and return garbage
> +(e.g. ~0). But many RISC platforms will crash (aka "Hard Fail").

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-24 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-24  5:26 [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 0/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 6) Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-24  5:31 ` [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 1/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 6) - Changes to generic PCI code Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-24  9:36   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-27  5:35     ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-24  5:32 ` [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 6) - Update Documentation/pci.txt Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-24 16:24   ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2006-03-24  5:34 ` [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 3/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 6) - Make Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-24  5:36 ` [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 4/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take 6) - Make Emulex lpfc " Kenji Kaneshige

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060324162458.GA4206@colo.lackof.org \
    --to=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox