public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Black <vampjon@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: uptime increases during suspend
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:18:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060325151818.GA10939@beacon.dhs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603251610.16566.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 04:10:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 25 March 2006 16:02, Jonathan Black wrote:
> > I'd like to enquire about the following behaviour:
> > 
> > $ uptime && sudo hibernate && uptime
> >  14:18:51 up 1 day, 4:12,  2 users,  load average: 0.58, 3.30, 2.42
> >  14:23:46 up 1 day, 4:17,  2 users,  load average: 20.34, 7.74, 3.91
> > 
> > I.e. the system was suspended to disk for 5 minutes, but the value
> > reported by 'uptime' has increased by as much, as if it had actually
> > continued running during that time.
> > 
> > I'm using Linux 2.6.16 with the latest version of the Suspend 2 patch
> > (2.2.1), but Nigel its maintainer says that this isn't actually related
> > to his suspend code, essentially the same would happen using the swsusp
> > code currently in the kernel, and therefore we need to ask the kernel
> > time code people about this issue.
> 
> Is your system an i386 or x86_64?

It is an i386.
 
-- 
jonathaN

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-25 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-25 15:02 uptime increases during suspend Jonathan Black
2006-03-25 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-25 15:18   ` Jonathan Black [this message]
2006-03-26 21:38     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-27 18:40 ` john stultz
2006-03-27 19:53   ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-03-27 20:01     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-27 22:30     ` Eric Piel
2006-03-28  3:57       ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-03-27 21:37   ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-03-27 22:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-29 14:52   ` Jonathan Black
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-28  2:01 Peter T. Breuer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060325151818.GA10939@beacon.dhs.org \
    --to=vampjon@gmail.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox