From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Security downgrade? CONFIG_HOTPLUG required in 2.6.16?
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:26:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060325192635.GQ4053@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44237D87.70300@tlinx.org>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:03:03PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I had this config'ed out in 2.6.15 for machine that didn't have
> any hotpluggable devices. It is also configured with all the
> modules it needs and has kernel-module loading disabled.
>
> What has changed in 2.6.16 that my "static" machine now
> needs hotplugging? As I understand it, hotplugging requires
> application-level support code (in /etc/) and a special
> application level "demon" to run in order to support these
> requests.
>
> I'd prefer my kernel not to be dependent on a run-time demon
> to load "arbitrary" (user defined) segments of code that could
> come from any source -- usually outside the vanilla kernel tree.
>
> If I don't want a specific kernel or machine to be dynamically
> reconfigurable after boot, why do I need to build in a mechanism for
> runtime loading of modules?
- hotplugging devices != module loading
- CONFIG_HOTPLUG does not load any code into the kernel.
- hotplugging devices can work without any userspace support
As an example, hotplugging an USB hard disk works fine with
CONFIG_MODULES=n and without any userspace support (assuming
a static /dev).
> Linda
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-25 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-24 5:03 Security downgrade? CONFIG_HOTPLUG required in 2.6.16? Linda Walsh
2006-03-25 18:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-26 10:11 ` Linda Walsh
2006-03-25 19:26 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-03-26 9:42 ` Linda Walsh
2006-03-26 19:29 ` Jim Crilly
2006-03-30 21:45 ` Linda Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060325192635.GQ4053@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox