public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, mingo@elte.hu,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, pj@sgi.com, hawkes@sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 1/2] sched_domain: handle kmalloc failure
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:02:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060326033219.GA12227@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060325184441.0f6ba5bc.akpm@osdl.org>

On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 06:44:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well, when is this code called?  It would be at boot time, in which case
> the allocations will succeed (if not, the boot fails) or at cpu/node
> hot-add, in which case the appropriate response is to fail to bring up the
> new cpu/node.


Hmm ..dont follow you here. Are you saying the above is the current
behavior (say in 2.6.16-mm1)? AFAICS that is not true because 
arch_init_sched_domains (which handles both bootup & cpu hot-add cases) 
doesnt return any error back to its caller.

Also note that build_sched_domains can be called from CPUset code too
(partition_sched_domains) when we modify the exclusive property of a CPUset.

> It's better to send the administrator back to work out why we ran out of
> memory than to appear to have brought the new cpu/node online, only to have
> it run funny.
> 
> I think?

I don't know. Is load balancing an absolute critical feature that
without it system bootup and cpu hot-add should be failed? Also note
that we may be able to do partial load balancing (between threads of a
CPU) even when there is memory allocation failure.

Regarding giving administrator hints of allocation failure, the printks in 
build_sched_domain do give those hints.

> 
> > > build_sched_domains() should be static and __cpuinit, btw.
> > 
> > Ok ..Will take care of that in the next version of the patch.
> > 
> 
> umm, it's probably best to not bother.  I think Ashok is looking into all
> the memory we're presently wasting on non-cpu_hotplug builds.  There's
> quite a lot in there.

Ok ..Will let Ashok take care of adding __cpuinit prefix.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-26  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-25  8:27 [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 1/2] sched_domain: handle kmalloc failure Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-26  2:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-26  2:40   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-26  2:44     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-26  3:03       ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-26  3:38         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-26  4:10           ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-26  3:32       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060326033219.GA12227@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hawkes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox