From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, mingo@elte.hu,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, pj@sgi.com, hawkes@sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 1/2] sched_domain: handle kmalloc failure
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:02:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060326033219.GA12227@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060325184441.0f6ba5bc.akpm@osdl.org>
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 06:44:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well, when is this code called? It would be at boot time, in which case
> the allocations will succeed (if not, the boot fails) or at cpu/node
> hot-add, in which case the appropriate response is to fail to bring up the
> new cpu/node.
Hmm ..dont follow you here. Are you saying the above is the current
behavior (say in 2.6.16-mm1)? AFAICS that is not true because
arch_init_sched_domains (which handles both bootup & cpu hot-add cases)
doesnt return any error back to its caller.
Also note that build_sched_domains can be called from CPUset code too
(partition_sched_domains) when we modify the exclusive property of a CPUset.
> It's better to send the administrator back to work out why we ran out of
> memory than to appear to have brought the new cpu/node online, only to have
> it run funny.
>
> I think?
I don't know. Is load balancing an absolute critical feature that
without it system bootup and cpu hot-add should be failed? Also note
that we may be able to do partial load balancing (between threads of a
CPU) even when there is memory allocation failure.
Regarding giving administrator hints of allocation failure, the printks in
build_sched_domain do give those hints.
>
> > > build_sched_domains() should be static and __cpuinit, btw.
> >
> > Ok ..Will take care of that in the next version of the patch.
> >
>
> umm, it's probably best to not bother. I think Ashok is looking into all
> the memory we're presently wasting on non-cpu_hotplug builds. There's
> quite a lot in there.
Ok ..Will let Ashok take care of adding __cpuinit prefix.
--
Regards,
vatsa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-26 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-25 8:27 [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 1/2] sched_domain: handle kmalloc failure Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-26 2:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-26 2:40 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-26 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-26 3:03 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-26 3:38 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-03-26 4:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-26 3:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060326033219.GA12227@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hawkes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox