public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Some section mismatch in acpi_processor_power_init on ia64 build
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:16:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060328161624.A31861@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F0613EDAB@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>; from tony.luck@intel.com on Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:09:36PM -0800

On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:09:36PM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> I've only just noticed these warnings when building ia64 !SMP or
> !HOTPLUG_CPU
> kernels:
> 
> WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o - Section mismatch: reference to
> .init.data: from .text between 'acpi_processor_power_init' (at offset
> 0x5040) and 'acpi_processor_power_exit'
> WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o - Section mismatch: reference to
> .init.data: from .text between 'acpi_processor_power_init' (at offset
> 0x5050) and 'acpi_processor_power_exit'
> 
> According to git bisect, they began with Matt Domsch's "ia64: use i386
> dmi_scan.c"
> patch (commit 3ed3bce8), but it appears that the real issue may be
> further back when
> Ashok Raj marked processor_power_dmi_table as __cpuinitdata in 7ded5689
> with a
> cryptic comment by AK (Andi Kleen?):
>   /* Actually this shouldn't be __cpuinitdata, would be better to fix
> the
>      callers to only run once -AK */
> 
> -Tony

Humm.. originally they were marked as __initdata, but for CPU hotplug we call it
when processor gets hot plugged. So i changed it to __cpuinitdata so that when we use
cpu hotplug they stay resident.

the only reference is to that table is from acpi_processor_power_init(), that gets called 
currently only from acpi_processor_start().

the code is either compiled in kernel (which means it will be all thrown after free
init mem if !HOTPLUG_CPU) or if this is a module code, then __initdata/cpuinit doesnt 
make a difference.

possibly acpi_processor_start(), acpi_processor_power_init() etc should also be
__cpuinit, which would make the warning go away. 

Are there any others i missed Andi? maybe this is a general watch out comment, but 
he knows better.

-- 
Cheers,
Ashok Raj
- Open Source Technology Center

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-29  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-28 23:09 Some section mismatch in acpi_processor_power_init on ia64 build Luck, Tony
2006-03-29  0:00 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-29  0:58   ` Luck, Tony
2006-03-29  0:16 ` Ashok Raj [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060328161624.A31861@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox