From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750784AbWC2I1u (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:27:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750782AbWC2I1t (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:27:49 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:40157 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750784AbWC2I1t (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:27:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:27:47 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Jens Axboe Cc: Mark Lord , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.16-git4: kernel BUG at block/ll_rw_blk.c:3497 Message-ID: <20060329082747.GV27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <44288882.4020809@rtr.ca> <20060329081642.GU8186@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060329081642.GU8186@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:16:43AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > triggering. What sort of testing were you running, exactly? > > Al, any ideas? I really wonder why it's the call from do_exit() that triggers it. The thing is, we get off-by-exactly-one here and all previous callers of that puppy would be elsewhere (cfq, mostly). IOW, we get exactly one extra call of put_io_context() _and_ have it happen before do_exit() (i.e. from normal IO paths). Interesting... Is there any way to reproduce it without too much PITA?