From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Takashi Sato <sho@tnes.nec.co.jp>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ext2/3: Support2^32-1blocks(e2fsprogs)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:41:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060330084142.GB3754@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143664718.4045.76.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 12:38:37PM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 12:00 -0800, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:35:10AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> >
> Wild suggestion, how about we don't update the global counter is the
> result is negative?
You mean just keep the local version even below -FBC_BATCH
and only empty it to the global unsigned counter if the result is going to
be +ve? That would work I think.
Thanks,
Kiran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-30 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-25 13:33 [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ext2/3: Support2^32-1blocks(e2fsprogs) sho
2006-03-26 22:37 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-27 4:17 ` Takashi Sato
2006-03-27 18:45 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-27 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-27 22:58 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-28 7:15 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-03-28 8:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-28 10:34 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-03-28 18:01 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-29 9:13 ` Laurent Vivier
[not found] ` <1143657317.4045.12.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
2006-03-29 20:00 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-29 20:38 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 8:41 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2006-03-30 1:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-31 22:42 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-02 20:13 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10 9:11 ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10 8:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-13 15:26 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-17 21:07 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 21:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-17 21:32 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-18 7:14 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 7:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-18 10:57 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 19:08 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-18 14:09 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 21:01 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-20 11:28 ` Laurent Vivier
[not found] ` <1145543970.5872.38.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
2006-04-21 11:17 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10 16:57 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10 19:06 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-11 7:07 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-14 17:23 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-30 17:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:01 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 17:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:16 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 19:22 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-31 6:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-31 13:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-01 6:50 ` Nathan Scott
2006-05-26 5:00 ` [PATCH 0/2]Define ext3 in-kernel filesystem block types and extend " Mingming Cao
2006-05-26 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30 17:55 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2]ext3 block allocation/reservation fixes to support 2**32 block numbers Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2]Other ext3 in-kernel block number type fix " Mingming Cao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-25 13:34 [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ext2/3: Support2^32-1blocks(e2fsprogs) sho
2006-03-15 12:39 [PATCH 2/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(e2fsprogs) Takashi Sato
2006-03-17 21:19 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-18 5:57 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1blocks(e2fsprogs) Takashi Sato
2006-03-22 23:45 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-23 18:16 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-24 1:54 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ext2/3: Support2^32-1blocks(e2fsprogs) Takashi Sato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060330084142.GB3754@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=Laurent.Vivier@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sho@tnes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox