public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioremap_cached()
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:34:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060330193457.GL13590@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73zmj7949i.fsf@verdi.suse.de>

On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> writes:
> 
> > We currently have three ways for getting access to device memory --
> > ioremap(), ioremap_nocache() and pci_iomap().  99% of the callers of
> > ioremap() are doing it to access device registers, and really, really
> > want to use ioremap_nocache() instead.  I presume nobody notices on PCs
> > because they have write-through caches, but it ought to trip up people
> > trying to flush writes.
> 
> Actually MTRRs take care of that on x86.
> So essentially on x86 ioremap() for devices is already ioremap_uncached()
> And ioremap on memory is cached.
> 
> That's nice and simple semantics that other platforms can emulate too.
> Doing things differently will just cause pain for the other platforms
> when they have to fix up drivers all the time.

That doesn't make any sense.  What's the point of ioremap_nocache() if
ioremap() does magic things that make things uncached?  And who says
you're allowed to ioremap() memory anyway?

> It all works fine until someone wants WC too. I would rather add a 
> ioremap_wc(), that would be more useful.

ioremap_wc() sounds like a good idea.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-30 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-30 16:41 [PATCH] ioremap_cached() Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-30 18:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-30 19:34   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-03-30 19:50     ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-30 20:14       ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-30 20:17         ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-30 20:21           ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-30 20:27             ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-31 11:20 ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060330193457.GL13590@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox