From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:35:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060331143500.GK9811@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143814889.8096.22.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:21:29AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
...
>
> Hmm... Nothing obvious.
Ok.
I'm wondering... Can anyone else reproduce this problem?
Just to explain quickly:
Running nfsbench (on the NFS client) once with LEADING_EMPTY_SPACE set
to 0 and then once with the option set to 1. If there's a big change
in wall-clock execution time, this indicates that the problem exists.
I'd be really interested in knowing whether I'm the only one who sees
this problem.
> Try catting /proc/self/mountstats and see if the entry for your NFS
> mount shows anything interesting.
mountstats doesn't exist on 2.6.15.7 so I can't really compare...
I wonder if any of the following is 'interesting' :)
device sparrow:/exported/joe mounted on /u/joe with fstype nfs statvers=1.0
opts: rw,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,acregmin=3,acregmax=60,acdirmin=30,
acdirmax=60,hard,intr,proto=udp,timeo=7,retrans=3
age: 274
caps: caps=0x1,wtmult=4096,dtsize=4096,bsize=0,namelen=255
sec: flavor=1
events: 175 77 3 3 14 15 108 4 0 7 0 4 0 1 2 0 0 14 0 1 4 0 0 0 0
bytes: 194733 11746 0 0 37748 15340 13 0
RPC iostats version: 1.0 p/v: 100003/3 (nfs)
xprt: udp 1023 0 74 74 0 74 0
per-op statistics
... then follows the nfsstat numbers as far as I can see ...
Does the above tell you anything?
--
/ jakob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-31 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-31 9:48 NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15 Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 11:22 ` NFS client regression, simple test program Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 12:22 ` NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15 Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 12:45 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 13:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 13:21 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 13:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 14:08 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 14:35 ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]
2006-03-31 14:49 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 14:57 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 15:04 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 15:24 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 16:35 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 18:52 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 15:55 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 16:04 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-03 15:26 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-03 15:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-04-03 15:45 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-04 9:22 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-24 22:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-04-25 8:08 ` Jakob Oestergaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060331143500.GK9811@unthought.net \
--to=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox