public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:35:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060331143500.GK9811@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143814889.8096.22.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:21:29AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
...
> 
> Hmm... Nothing obvious.

Ok.

I'm wondering... Can anyone else reproduce this problem?

Just to explain quickly:
 Running nfsbench (on the NFS client) once with LEADING_EMPTY_SPACE set
 to 0 and then once with the option set to 1.  If there's a big change
 in wall-clock execution time, this indicates that the problem exists.

I'd be really interested in knowing whether I'm the only one who sees
this problem.

> Try catting /proc/self/mountstats and see if the entry for your NFS
> mount shows anything interesting.

mountstats doesn't exist on 2.6.15.7 so I can't really compare...

I wonder if any of the following is 'interesting'  :)

device sparrow:/exported/joe mounted on /u/joe with fstype nfs statvers=1.0
 opts: rw,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,acregmin=3,acregmax=60,acdirmin=30,
       acdirmax=60,hard,intr,proto=udp,timeo=7,retrans=3
 age:    274
 caps:   caps=0x1,wtmult=4096,dtsize=4096,bsize=0,namelen=255
 sec:    flavor=1
 events: 175 77 3 3 14 15 108 4 0 7 0 4 0 1 2 0 0 14 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 
 bytes:  194733 11746 0 0 37748 15340 13 0 
 RPC iostats version: 1.0  p/v: 100003/3 (nfs)
 xprt:   udp 1023 0 74 74 0 74 0
 per-op statistics
 ... then follows the nfsstat numbers as far as I can see ...

Does the above tell you anything?

-- 

 / jakob


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-31 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-31  9:48 NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15 Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 11:22 ` NFS client regression, simple test program Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 12:22 ` NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15 Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 12:45   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 13:06     ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 13:21       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 13:44         ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 14:08           ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 14:21             ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 14:35               ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]
2006-03-31 14:49                 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 14:57                   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 15:04                     ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 15:24                       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 16:35                         ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 18:52                           ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 15:55                 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 16:04                   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-03 15:26                     ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-03 15:41                       ` Trond Myklebust
2006-04-03 15:45                         ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-04  9:22                           ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-24 22:03                             ` Trond Myklebust
2006-04-25  8:08                               ` Jakob Oestergaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060331143500.GK9811@unthought.net \
    --to=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox