From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
To: John Mylchreest <johnm@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] POWERPC: Fix ppc32 compile with gcc+SSP in 2.6.16
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 13:42:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060402114215.GA30491@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060402112002.GA3443@getafix.willow.local>
On Sun, Apr 02, John Mylchreest wrote:
> Going from that, I can push a patch for gcc upstream to remove the
> __KERNEL__ dep, but gcc4.1 ships with ssp by standard, and the semantics
> between the IBM patch for SSP applied to gcc-3 and ggc-4 have changed.
gcc4.1 has no obvious problems with --enable-ssp
> -fno-stack-protector would work for gcc4, but for gcc3 it could still be
> patially enabled, and requires -fno-stack-protector-all. Mind If I ask
> whats incorrect about defining __KERNEL__ for the bootcflags?
arch/powerpc/boot is no kernel code, its supposed to be selfcontained.
Prepare a patch which uses the cc-option macro.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-02 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-01 22:48 [PATCH 1/1] POWERPC: Fix ppc32 compile with gcc+SSP in 2.6.16 John Mylchreest
2006-04-02 8:58 ` Olaf Hering
2006-04-02 10:22 ` John Mylchreest
2006-04-02 10:28 ` Olaf Hering
2006-04-02 10:58 ` John Mylchreest
2006-04-02 11:10 ` Olaf Hering
2006-04-02 11:20 ` John Mylchreest
2006-04-02 11:42 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2006-04-04 8:57 ` John Mylchreest
2006-04-04 9:41 ` Olaf Hering
2006-04-04 10:01 ` John Mylchreest
2006-04-04 10:58 ` Olaf Hering
2006-04-10 9:01 ` John Mylchreest
2006-04-02 13:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-02 13:56 ` John Mylchreest
2006-04-02 14:01 ` Olaf Hering
2006-04-02 14:35 ` John Mylchreest
2006-04-02 14:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-02 15:22 ` John Mylchreest
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060402114215.GA30491@suse.de \
--to=olh@suse.de \
--cc=johnm@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox