From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932317AbWDCEsM (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 00:48:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932325AbWDCEsM (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 00:48:12 -0400 Received: from mail09.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.190]:44237 "EHLO mail09.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932317AbWDCEsM (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 00:48:12 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: lowmem_reserve question Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:48:00 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Nick Piggin , ck@vds.kolivas.org, Andrew Morton , linux list References: <200604021401.13331.kernel@kolivas.org> <200604031248.13532.kernel@kolivas.org> <1144039366.8198.2.camel@homer> In-Reply-To: <1144039366.8198.2.camel@homer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604031448.01391.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 03 April 2006 14:42, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 12:48 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > Furthermore, now that we have the option of up to 3GB lowmem split on > > 32bit we can have a default lowmem_reserve of almost 12MB (if I'm reading > > it right) which seems very tight with only 16MB of ZONE_DMA. > > I haven't crawled around in the vm for ages, but I think that's only > 16MB if you support antique cards. That's what the ram is used for, but that is all the ZONE_DMA 32bit machines get, whether you use it for that purpose or not. My concern is that this will have all sorts of effects on the balancing since it will always appear almost full. Cheers, Con