From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932271AbWDCRLR@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932271AbWDCRLR (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:11:17 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932325AbWDCRLR
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:11:17 -0400
Received: from ftp.linux-mips.org ([194.74.144.162]:28299 "EHLO
	ftp.linux-mips.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932271AbWDCRLQ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:11:16 -0400
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 18:11:13 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: haveblue@us.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
Message-ID: <20060403171113.GB29351@linux-mips.org>
References: <20060323162459.6D45D1CE@localhost.localdomain> <20060403124916.GA14044@linux-mips.org> <20060403083940.a9dff4a3.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060403083940.a9dff4a3.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:39:40AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:49:16 +0100 Ralf Baechle wrote:
> 
> > How about posting such stuff to linux-arch?  No sane person follows l-k.
> 
> Can we do anything about lkml?  It "doesn't scale."

Not terribly much other than carefully choosing the right addresses of
people and lists to post to.  The only thing that's worse than too much
email is no email ...

  Ralf