From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.3.1 for 2.6.16-rc5
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:29:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604040929.48198.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4431A9E7.40406@bigpond.net.au>
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 09:04, Peter Williams wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > Is there a module to autotune these values according to cpu/mem/ctxt
> > performance?
I think you're thinking of Jake's genetic algorithms (separate patch). They
tune the zaphod scheduler but bear in mind the limitation of such an
algorithm is they can only tune for one workload which means that if you have
two workloads running concurrently with different requirements, the other
will suffer.
> > Also, different schedulers per cpu could be rather useful.
> > Peter Williams wrote:
> I think that would be dangerous. However, different schedulers per
> cpuset might make sense but it involve a fair bit of work.
I'm curious. How do you think different schedulers per cpu would be useful?
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-03 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-03 11:59 [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.3.1 for 2.6.16-rc5 Al Boldi
2006-04-03 12:13 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-04-03 23:04 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-03 23:29 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-04-04 0:01 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 0:12 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-04 1:29 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 13:27 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-04 13:27 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-04 23:17 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-05 8:16 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-05 22:53 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-07 21:32 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-08 1:29 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-08 20:31 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-09 2:58 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-09 5:04 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-09 23:53 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-10 14:43 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-11 2:07 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-03 23:27 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-04 13:27 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-04 23:20 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-05 8:16 ` Al Boldi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-28 22:32 Peter Williams
2006-03-01 2:36 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-02 2:04 ` Peter Williams
2006-04-02 6:02 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200604040929.48198.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox