From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org
Cc: keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Keys: Improve usage of memory barriers and remove IRQ disablement
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:55:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060404095529.31311.3892.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
The attached patch adds a missing memory barrier into the key_put() and removes
an unnecessary barrier from install_session_keyring().
install_session_keyring() is also rearranged a little to make it slightly more
efficient.
As install_*_keyring() may schedule (in synchronize_rcu() or keyring_alloc()),
they may not be entered with interrupts disabled - and so there's no point
saving the interrupt disablement state over the critical section.
exec_keys() will also be invoked with interrupts enabled, and so that doesn't
need to save the interrupt state either.
---
security/keys/key.c | 1 +
security/keys/process_keys.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/keys/key.c b/security/keys/key.c
index 99781b7..d8a6e00 100644
--- a/security/keys/key.c
+++ b/security/keys/key.c
@@ -619,6 +619,7 @@ void key_put(struct key *key)
if (key) {
key_check(key);
+ smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&key->usage))
schedule_work(&key_cleanup_task);
}
diff --git a/security/keys/process_keys.c b/security/keys/process_keys.c
index 74cb79e..ad123c3 100644
--- a/security/keys/process_keys.c
+++ b/security/keys/process_keys.c
@@ -167,11 +167,12 @@ error:
*/
int install_process_keyring(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- unsigned long flags;
struct key *keyring;
char buf[20];
int ret;
+ might_sleep();
+
if (!tsk->signal->process_keyring) {
sprintf(buf, "_pid.%u", tsk->tgid);
@@ -182,12 +183,12 @@ int install_process_keyring(struct task_
}
/* attach keyring */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
if (!tsk->signal->process_keyring) {
tsk->signal->process_keyring = keyring;
keyring = NULL;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
key_put(keyring);
}
@@ -206,38 +207,37 @@ error:
static int install_session_keyring(struct task_struct *tsk,
struct key *keyring)
{
- unsigned long flags;
struct key *old;
char buf[20];
- int ret;
+
+ might_sleep();
/* create an empty session keyring */
if (!keyring) {
sprintf(buf, "_ses.%u", tsk->tgid);
keyring = keyring_alloc(buf, tsk->uid, tsk->gid, 1, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(keyring)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(keyring);
- goto error;
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(keyring))
+ return PTR_ERR(keyring);
}
else {
atomic_inc(&keyring->usage);
}
/* install the keyring */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->sighand->siglock, flags);
- old = rcu_dereference(tsk->signal->session_keyring);
+ spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
+ old = tsk->signal->session_keyring;
rcu_assign_pointer(tsk->signal->session_keyring, keyring);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
- ret = 0;
+ /* we're using RCU on the pointer, but there's no point synchronising
+ * on it if it didn't previously point to anything */
+ if (old) {
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ key_put(old);
+ }
- /* we're using RCU on the pointer */
- synchronize_rcu();
- key_put(old);
-error:
- return ret;
+ return 0;
} /* end install_session_keyring() */
@@ -310,7 +310,6 @@ void exit_keys(struct task_struct *tsk)
*/
int exec_keys(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- unsigned long flags;
struct key *old;
/* newly exec'd tasks don't get a thread keyring */
@@ -322,10 +321,10 @@ int exec_keys(struct task_struct *tsk)
key_put(old);
/* discard the process keyring from a newly exec'd task */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
old = tsk->signal->process_keyring;
tsk->signal->process_keyring = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
key_put(old);
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-04 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-04 9:55 David Howells [this message]
2006-04-04 10:23 ` [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Improve usage of memory barriers and remove IRQ disablement David Howells
2006-04-04 10:58 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-05 8:46 ` David Howells
2006-04-05 9:23 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-05 22:51 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060404095529.31311.3892.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox