From: Charles Shannon Hendrix <shannon@widomaker.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 10:47:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060405144716.GA10353@widomaker.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060327195905.7f666cb5.akpm@osdl.org>
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 @ 19:59 -0800, Andrew Morton said:
> Much porkiness.
>
> /proc/meminfo is very useful for obtaining a top-level view of where all
> the memory's gone to. I'd tentatively say that your options are to put up
> with the swapping or find a new mail client.
I use mutt for my email, and I have the same issue on a 1GB system.
I really wish we could put an upper limit on what file cache can use.
I understand the original poster was running a lot of pork, but you
don't have to and still see a problem with swapping. Even running KDE
my total application memory most of the time is 300MB or less on a
machine with 1GB of memory.
I shouldn't be suffering from swap storms.
For example, my normal working set of programs eats about 250MB of memory. If
I also start a job running to something like tag some mp3s, copy a CD, or just
process a lot of files, it only takes a few minutes before performance becomes
unacceptable.
If you are doing some work where you switch among several applications
frequently, the pigginess of file cache becomes a serious problem.
Isn't that bad behavior by any measure?
--
shannon "AT" widomaker.com -- ["It's a damn poor mind that can only think
of one way to spell a word." -- Andrew Jackson]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-05 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-28 1:53 OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise Lee Revell
2006-03-28 3:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-28 4:09 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-28 4:12 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-28 4:20 ` Lee Revell
2006-04-05 14:47 ` Charles Shannon Hendrix [this message]
2006-04-05 20:47 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-05-02 4:12 ` Charles Shannon Hendrix
2006-04-11 8:33 ` Linda Walsh
2006-05-02 4:21 ` Charles Shannon Hendrix
2006-05-02 5:04 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-28 11:41 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-06 1:13 Shantanu Goel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060405144716.GA10353@widomaker.com \
--to=shannon@widomaker.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox