From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932119AbWDEWxa (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:53:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932118AbWDEWx3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:53:29 -0400 Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:8577 "EHLO sorel.sous-sol.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932115AbWDEWx2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:53:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:55:35 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Herbert Rosmanith Cc: Chris Wright , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Kyle Moffett , Robin Holt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall Message-ID: <20060405225535.GO15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> References: <20060405223052.GE14724@sorel.sous-sol.org> <200604052246.k35Mkl6L010288@wildsau.enemy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200604052246.k35Mkl6L010288@wildsau.enemy.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Herbert Rosmanith (kernel@wildsau.enemy.org) wrote: > good point. I was reading netlink.c and libaudit.c. obviously the wrong > place ;-) There's a decent README with the audit (userspace) source. And the actual message format is documented in source code only AFAIK.