* [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge
@ 2006-03-23 2:06 Peter Chubb
2006-03-23 2:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-06 20:37 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Chubb @ 2006-03-23 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shemminger; +Cc: linux-kernel
I see lots of
kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6f, ip=0xa000000100811591
kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6b, ip=0xa0000001008115c1
kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6d, ip=0xa0000001008115f1
messages in my logs on IA64 when using the ethernet bridge with 2.6.16.
Appended is a patch to fix them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-import/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-import.orig/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2006-03-22 09:11:01.349886375 +1100
+++ linux-2.6-import/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2006-03-23 12:52:13.719239205 +1100
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/llc.h>
#include <net/llc.h>
#include <net/llc_pdu.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
#include "br_private.h"
#include "br_private_stp.h"
@@ -59,12 +60,12 @@ static inline void br_set_ticks(unsigned
{
unsigned long ticks = (STP_HZ * j)/ HZ;
- *((__be16 *) dest) = htons(ticks);
+ put_unaligned(htons(ticks), (__be16 *)dest);
}
static inline int br_get_ticks(const unsigned char *src)
{
- unsigned long ticks = ntohs(*(__be16 *)src);
+ unsigned long ticks = ntohs(get_unaligned((__be16 *)src));
return (ticks * HZ + STP_HZ - 1) / STP_HZ;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge
2006-03-23 2:06 [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge Peter Chubb
@ 2006-03-23 2:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-23 3:04 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-03-23 3:05 ` Patrick McFarland
2006-04-06 20:37 ` Adrian Bunk
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2006-03-23 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Chubb; +Cc: shemminger, linux-kernel
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:06:02 +1100 Peter Chubb wrote:
That's all that I see unless I look at the raw email file with
a text editor. Neither sylpheed nor thunderbird care for it...
What's up with this email message?
---
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge
2006-03-23 2:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
@ 2006-03-23 3:04 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-03-23 3:05 ` Patrick McFarland
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Miell @ 2006-03-23 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy.Dunlap; +Cc: Peter Chubb, shemminger, linux-kernel
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 18:50 -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:06:02 +1100 Peter Chubb wrote:
>
> That's all that I see unless I look at the raw email file with
> a text editor. Neither sylpheed nor thunderbird care for it...
>
> What's up with this email message?
The message body is in multipart/mixed format, but it contains nothing
besides a preamble, which MIME conformant MUAs ignore.
Typically, the preamble is just "This is a multipart MIME formatted
message.", but Peter's mailer seems to have decided to stick his entire
message body there.
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge
2006-03-23 2:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-23 3:04 ` Nicholas Miell
@ 2006-03-23 3:05 ` Patrick McFarland
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McFarland @ 2006-03-23 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy.Dunlap; +Cc: Peter Chubb, shemminger, linux-kernel
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 21:50, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:06:02 +1100 Peter Chubb wrote:
>
> That's all that I see unless I look at the raw email file with
> a text editor. Neither sylpheed nor thunderbird care for it...
>
> What's up with this email message?
Kmail doesnt like it either. Its multipart, but the plain text body part is
empty. How strange.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || diablod3@gmail.com
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids,
we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and
listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo,
Inc, 1989
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge
2006-03-23 2:06 [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge Peter Chubb
2006-03-23 2:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
@ 2006-04-06 20:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-07 23:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2006-04-06 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Chubb; +Cc: shemminger, linux-kernel, netdev
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:06:02PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
>
> I see lots of
> kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6f, ip=0xa000000100811591
> kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6b, ip=0xa0000001008115c1
> kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6d, ip=0xa0000001008115f1
> messages in my logs on IA64 when using the ethernet bridge with 2.6.16.
>
>
> Appended is a patch to fix them.
I see this patch already made it into 2.6.17-rc1.
It seems to be a candidate for 2.6.16.3, too?
If yes, please submit it to stable@kernel.org.
> Signed-off-by: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
>
>
> net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-import/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-import.orig/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2006-03-22 09:11:01.349886375 +1100
> +++ linux-2.6-import/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2006-03-23 12:52:13.719239205 +1100
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/llc.h>
> #include <net/llc.h>
> #include <net/llc_pdu.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> #include "br_private.h"
> #include "br_private_stp.h"
> @@ -59,12 +60,12 @@ static inline void br_set_ticks(unsigned
> {
> unsigned long ticks = (STP_HZ * j)/ HZ;
>
> - *((__be16 *) dest) = htons(ticks);
> + put_unaligned(htons(ticks), (__be16 *)dest);
> }
>
> static inline int br_get_ticks(const unsigned char *src)
> {
> - unsigned long ticks = ntohs(*(__be16 *)src);
> + unsigned long ticks = ntohs(get_unaligned((__be16 *)src));
>
> return (ticks * HZ + STP_HZ - 1) / STP_HZ;
> }
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge
2006-04-06 20:37 ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2006-04-07 23:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-09 14:26 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2006-04-07 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: Peter Chubb, linux-kernel, netdev
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 22:37:08 +0200
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:06:02PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
> >
> > I see lots of
> > kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6f, ip=0xa000000100811591
> > kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6b, ip=0xa0000001008115c1
> > kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6d, ip=0xa0000001008115f1
> > messages in my logs on IA64 when using the ethernet bridge with 2.6.16.
> >
> >
> > Appended is a patch to fix them.
>
>
> I see this patch already made it into 2.6.17-rc1.
>
> It seems to be a candidate for 2.6.16.3, too?
> If yes, please submit it to stable@kernel.org.
The code that caused this was new in 2.6.17
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge
2006-04-07 23:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2006-04-09 14:26 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2006-04-09 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: Peter Chubb, linux-kernel, netdev
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:57:11PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 22:37:08 +0200
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:06:02PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
> > >
> > > I see lots of
> > > kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6f, ip=0xa000000100811591
> > > kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6b, ip=0xa0000001008115c1
> > > kernel unaligned access to 0xa0000001009dbb6d, ip=0xa0000001008115f1
> > > messages in my logs on IA64 when using the ethernet bridge with 2.6.16.
> > >
> > >
> > > Appended is a patch to fix them.
> >
> >
> > I see this patch already made it into 2.6.17-rc1.
> >
> > It seems to be a candidate for 2.6.16.3, too?
> > If yes, please submit it to stable@kernel.org.
>
> The code that caused this was new in 2.6.17
Ah sorry, Peter's "when using the ethernet bridge with 2.6.16" confused
me.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-09 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-23 2:06 [PATCH] Unaligned accesses in the ethernet bridge Peter Chubb
2006-03-23 2:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-23 3:04 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-03-23 3:05 ` Patrick McFarland
2006-04-06 20:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-07 23:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-09 14:26 ` Adrian Bunk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox