Re: [2.6 patch] let X86_VOYAGER depend on SMP

James Bottomley
2006-04-27T23:08:12Z

On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> I was kinda waiting for James to express an opinion. In theory it'd be
> better to make uniproc-on-Voyager build, boot and run like the wind.

I do have making uniprocessor build work on my todo list. There are
actually a surprising number of non-smp machines out their (mainly
3360s).

James