From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932386AbWDGJCg (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 05:02:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932393AbWDGJCg (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 05:02:36 -0400 Received: from mail01.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.182]:20436 "EHLO mail01.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932386AbWDGJCg (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 05:02:36 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: limit lowmem_reserve Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 19:02:15 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Andrew Morton , ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux list , linux-mm@kvack.org References: <200604021401.13331.kernel@kolivas.org> <200604061110.35789.kernel@kolivas.org> <443605E1.7060203@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <443605E1.7060203@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604071902.16011.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 April 2006 16:25, Nick Piggin wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > It is possible with a low enough lowmem_reserve ratio to make > > zone_watermark_ok always fail if the lower_zone is small enough. > > I don't see how this would happen? 3GB lowmem and a reserve ratio of 180 is enough to do it. Cheers, Con