Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks

Stephen Smalley
2006-04-17T18:11:38Z

On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 11:02 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
> --- Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > > Or, better, remove LSM itself ;)
> >
> > Seriously that makes a lot of sense. All other
> > modules people have come up
> > with over the last years are irrelevant and/or
> > broken by design.
>
> Didn't you mean "Bah!" (waves paw)?
>
> I understand the enthusiasm that the SELinux
> following demonstrates for the technology.
> I do not appreciate the bashing of alternatives.

Then provide a counterexample.

--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency