Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks

Casey Schaufler
2006-04-17T18:02:33Z

--- Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> > Or, better, remove LSM itself ;)
>
> Seriously that makes a lot of sense. All other
> modules people have come up
> with over the last years are irrelevant and/or
> broken by design.

Didn't you mean "Bah!" (waves paw)?

I understand the enthusiasm that the SELinux
following demonstrates for the technology.
I do not appreciate the bashing of alternatives.

Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com