From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Subject: [PATCH rc1-mm 0/3] coredump: rfc
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 04:11:00 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060409001059.GA95@oleg> (raw)
I am unsure about this series. It adds some optimizations, but
complicates the code.
So I am asking for yours opinion not only about correctness, but
also about usefulness.
Oleg.
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-08 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-09 0:11 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2006-04-10 6:54 ` [PATCH rc1-mm 0/3] coredump: rfc Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060409001059.GA95@oleg \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox