From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932086AbWDJStS (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:49:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932090AbWDJStS (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:49:18 -0400 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:8831 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932086AbWDJStR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:49:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:46:04 -0700 From: Joel Becker To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] CONFIGFS_FS must depend on SYSFS Message-ID: <20060410184604.GZ29730@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mail-Followup-To: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060326122552.GM4053@stusta.de> <20060327030622.GV7844@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20060410183522.GE2408@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060410183522.GE2408@stusta.de> X-Burt-Line: Trees are cool. X-Red-Smith: Ninety feet between bases is perhaps as close as man has ever come to perfection. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 08:35:22PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > OTOH, there's the question whether it matters at all - is the > intersection of the people who are in such space-limited environments > that they are setting CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y and then CONFIG_SYSFS=n and > the people using OCFS2 actually non-empty? We decided that (configfs + !sysfs == 0), and we just went with the direct dependancy. It's in my tree, going to Linus whenever it gets there. Joel -- "I don't even butter my bread; I consider that cooking." - Katherine Cebrian Joel Becker Principal Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127