From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk-lkml@gmx.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix de_thread() vs do_coredump() deadlock
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:47:53 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060411114753.GA1088@oleg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060411072722.0953A1809BB@magilla.sf.frob.com>
On 04/11, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > So, de_thread() sets SIGNAL_GROUP_EXEC and sends SIGKILL to other thereads.
> >
> > Sub-thread receives the signal, and calls get_signal_to_deliver->do_group_exit.
> > do_group_exit() calls zap_other_threads(SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) because there is no
> > SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT set. zap_other_threads() notices SIGNAL_GROUP_EXEC, wakes up
> > execer, and changes ->signal->flags to SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT.
> >
> > de_thread() re-locks sighand, sees !SIGNAL_GROUP_EXEC and goes to 'dying:'.
>
> That is what I intend. The exec'ing thread backs out and processes its SIGKILL.
> It sounds like you are calling this scenario a problem, but I don't know why.
Oh, probably I missed something. But as I can see it, MT exec can never succeed!
Once again. Process starts exec, it has no pending signals. Execer thread sets
SIGNAL_GROUP_EXEC, sends SIGKILL to other threads, and waits them to die.
The first thread which dequeues SIGKILL will change SIGNAL_GROUP_EXEC to
SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT, thus aborting exec.
Sorry for persistance if I really misunderstand this patch.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-11 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-13 16:50 [PATCH] fix de_thread() vs do_coredump() deadlock Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-10 1:36 ` Roland McGrath
2006-04-10 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-11 7:27 ` Roland McGrath
2006-04-11 11:47 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2006-04-11 9:10 ` Roland McGrath
2006-04-11 12:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-10 21:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-11 8:01 ` Roland McGrath
2006-04-11 13:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-11 9:49 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060411114753.GA1088@oleg \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtk-lkml@gmx.net \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).