public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Ramakanth Gunuganti <rgunugan@yahoo.com>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL issues
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:13:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060411161358.GI3190@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060411154944.65714.qmail@web54308.mail.yahoo.com>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:49:44AM -0700, Ramakanth Gunuganti wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the replies, talking to a lawyer seems to
> be too stringent a requirement to even evaluate Linux.
> Who would be the ultimate authority to give definitive
> answers to these questions? 

There is none:

The kernel has _many_ people holding a copyright on part of the kernel, 
and there's no ultimate authority except for the COPYING file shipped 
with the kernel sources.

The GPL is just a licence, and if you distribute your product to N 
countries, this means you can potentially be sued in N countries based 
on N different copyright laws.

There are things that are clear. E.g. if you'd have read the COPYING 
file shipped with the kernel sources, you could have answered at least 
one of your questions yourself.

But the exact borders of what is a "derived work" work and what is not 
are not well-defined and therefore unknown unless there have been court 
cases in all N countries you are distributing your product to.

Many things have never been challenged in court, and might never be, but 
remember that e.g. Harald Welte recently has much success with enforcing 
the GPL in cases of obvious violations at for products shipped in 
Germany at German courts.

> Since it's the Linux kernel that's under GPLv2, any
> work done here should be released under GPLv2. That
> part seems to be clear, however any product would
> include other things that could be proprietary. If
> Linux kernel is made part of this proprietary package,
> how does the distribution work. Can we just claim that
> part of the package is under GPL and only release the
> source code for the kernel portions. 

I am not a lawyer, but the distribution alone shouldn't be a problem - 
that is similar to what most Linux distributions are doing.

> -Ram

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-11 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-11  6:31 GPL issues Ramakanth Gunuganti
2006-04-11  8:42 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-04-11 10:51   ` Martin Mares
2006-04-11 17:46   ` Horst von Brand
2006-04-11 13:49 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-04-11 15:49   ` Ramakanth Gunuganti
2006-04-11 16:07     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-11 16:29       ` Stefan Smietanowski
2006-04-11 16:13     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-04-11 16:15     ` Kyle Moffett
2006-04-11 16:23     ` Dave Neuer
2006-04-11 18:58     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-14 11:39       ` David Schwartz
2006-04-14 14:54         ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-14 17:50         ` David Weinehall
2006-04-14 18:56           ` David Schwartz
2006-04-15 11:55             ` Alan Cox
2006-04-15 13:04               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 18:49               ` David Schwartz
2006-04-11 15:49   ` Ramakanth Gunuganti
2006-04-11 23:06 ` David Weinehall
2006-04-12  2:38   ` Joshua Hudson
2006-04-12  3:18     ` Mark Lord
2006-04-12  5:00       ` Kyle Moffett
2006-04-12  5:31       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-12  5:45         ` jdow
2006-04-12  6:01           ` David Weinehall
2006-04-12  6:26             ` jdow
2006-04-12  9:13             ` Stefan Smietanowski
2006-04-12 11:33               ` Olivier Galibert
2006-04-12 14:51           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-13 22:07             ` Mark Lord
2006-04-15 11:14               ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-13 22:17         ` Mark Lord
2006-04-15 11:15           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-11 23:12 ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-12  7:01 Pramod Srinivasan
2006-04-12  8:16 ` David Weinehall
2006-04-12  9:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-12  9:22   ` Stefan Smietanowski
2006-04-12  9:40     ` Martin Mares
2006-04-12  9:28   ` Alan Cox
2006-04-14 11:39 ` David Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060411161358.GI3190@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
    --cc=rgunugan@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox