public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] quell interactive feeding frenzy
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:51:21 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604132151.22359.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200604121825.55054.a1426z@gawab.com>

On Thursday 13 April 2006 01:25, Al Boldi wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Nvidia driver; all separate tasks in top.
>
> On a 400MhzP2 i810drm w/ kernel HZ=1000 it stutters.
> You may want to compensate for nvidia w/ a few cpu-hogs.

I tried adding cpu hogs and it gets extremely slow very soon but still doesn't 
stutter here.

> How many gears fps do you get?

When those 3 are running concurrently (without any other cpu hogs) gears is 
showing 317 fps.

> > range 63-73 seconds.
>
> Could this 10s skew be improved to around 1s to aid smoothness?

I'm happy to try... but I doubt it. 10% difference over 10 tasks over 10 mins 
of tasks of that wake/sleep nature is pretty good IMO. I'll see if there's 
anywhere else I can make the cpu accounting any better. 

As an aside, note that sched_clock and nanosecond timing with TSC isn't 
actually used if you use the pm timer which undoes any high res accounting 
the cpu scheduler can do (I noticed this when playing with pm timer that 
sched_clock just returns jiffies resolution instead of real nanosecond res). 
This could undo any smoothness that good cpu accounting can do.

-- 
-ck

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-13 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200604112100.28725.kernel@kolivas.org>
2006-04-11 17:03 ` Fwd: Re: [patch][rfc] quell interactive feeding frenzy Al Boldi
2006-04-11 22:56   ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-12  5:41     ` Al Boldi
2006-04-12  6:22       ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-12  8:17         ` Al Boldi
2006-04-12  9:36           ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-12 10:39             ` Al Boldi
2006-04-12 11:27               ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-12 15:25                 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-13 11:51                   ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-04-14  3:16                     ` Al Boldi
2006-04-15  7:05                       ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-15 18:23                         ` [ck] " Michael Gerdau
2006-04-15 20:45                         ` Al Boldi
2006-04-15 23:22                           ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-16 18:44                             ` [ck] " Andreas Mohr
2006-04-17  0:08                               ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-19  8:37                                 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-04-19  8:59                                   ` jos poortvliet
2006-04-15 22:32                         ` jos poortvliet
2006-04-15 23:06                           ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-16  6:02                   ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-16  8:31                     ` Al Boldi
2006-04-16  8:58                       ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-16 10:37                       ` was " Con Kolivas
2006-04-16 19:03                         ` Al Boldi
2006-04-16 23:26                           ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-09 16:44 [patch][rfc] " Al Boldi
2006-04-09 18:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-10 14:43   ` Al Boldi
2006-04-11 10:57     ` Con Kolivas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-07  9:38 Mike Galbraith
2006-04-07  9:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-07  9:52   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-04-07 10:57     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-07 11:00       ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-07 11:09         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-07 10:40   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-07 12:56 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-07 13:37   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-07 13:56     ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-07 14:14       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-07 15:16         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-09 11:14         ` bert hubert
2006-04-09 11:39           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-09 12:14             ` bert hubert
2006-04-09 18:07               ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-10  9:12                 ` bert hubert
2006-04-10 10:00                   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-10 14:56                     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-13  7:41                       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-13 10:16                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-13 11:05                           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-04-09 18:24               ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200604132151.22359.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox