From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pids: simplify do_each_task_pid/while_each_task_pid
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 01:56:21 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060413215621.GA355@oleg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060413133814.GA29914@infradead.org>
On 04/13, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> This is prtty ugly. Can't we just have a
>
> #define for_each_task_pid(task, pid, type, pos) \
> hlist_for_each_entry_rcu((task), (pos), \
> (&(pid))->tasks[type], pids[type].node) {
>
> and move the find_pid to the caller? That would make the code a whole lot
> more readable.
How about this? :)
Oleg.
--- MM/include/linux/pid.h~ 2006-03-23 22:48:10.000000000 +0300
+++ MM/include/linux/pid.h 2006-04-14 01:49:08.000000000 +0400
@@ -98,22 +98,22 @@ extern void FASTCALL(free_pid(struct pid
hlist_entry(pid_next(task, type), struct task_struct, \
pids[(type)].node)
+#define for_each_task_pid(who, type, t) \
+ for ((t) = ({ \
+ struct pid *pid___ = find_pid(who); \
+ pid___ \
+ ? hlist_entry((&pid___->tasks[type])->first, typeof(*(t)), pids[type].node) \
+ : hlist_entry(NULL, typeof(*(t)), pids[type].node); \
+ }); \
+ rcu_dereference(t) != hlist_entry(NULL, typeof(*(t)), pids[type].node) \
+ && ({ prefetch((t)->pids[type].node.next); 1; }); \
+ (t) = hlist_entry((t)->pids[type].node.next, typeof(*(t)), pids[type].node))
-/* We could use hlist_for_each_entry_rcu here but it takes more arguments
- * than the do_each_task_pid/while_each_task_pid. So we roll our own
- * to preserve the existing interface.
- */
-#define do_each_task_pid(who, type, task) \
- if ((task = find_task_by_pid_type(type, who))) { \
- prefetch(pid_next(task, type)); \
- do {
+/* obsolete */
+#define do_each_task_pid(who, type, task) \
+ do for_each_task_pid(who, type, task)
-#define while_each_task_pid(who, type, task) \
- } while (pid_next(task, type) && ({ \
- task = pid_next_task(task, type); \
- rcu_dereference(task); \
- prefetch(pid_next(task, type)); \
- 1; }) ); \
- }
+#define while_each_task_pid(who, type, task) \
+ while (0)
#endif /* _LINUX_PID_H */
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-13 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 16:37 [PATCH] pids: simplify do_each_task_pid/while_each_task_pid Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-13 13:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-04-13 17:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-13 14:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-13 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-04-13 20:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-13 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-04-13 17:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-04-13 21:56 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060413215621.GA355@oleg \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox