public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	Takashi Sato <sho@tnes.nec.co.jp>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ext2-devel <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:08:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060418190829.GA3905@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1145357820.17767.11.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:57:00PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> 
> I made tests on same system (x440) with postmark-1.51 :
> 
> pm> set numbers 100000
> pm> set transactions 250000
> pm> run
> 
> With atomic_t:
> 
> Time:
>         3761 seconds total
>         2414 seconds of transactions (103 per second)
> 
> Files:
>         225064 created (59 per second)
>                 Creation alone: 100000 files (87 per second)
>                 Mixed with transactions: 125064 files (51 per second)
>         124961 read (51 per second)
>         124895 appended (51 per second)
>         225064 deleted (59 per second)
>                 Deletion alone: 100128 files (503 per second)
>                 Mixed with transactions: 124936 files (51 per second)
> 
> Data:
>         731.14 megabytes read (199.07 kilobytes per second)
>         1359.02 megabytes written (370.02 kilobytes per second)
> 
> With percpu_counter:
> 
> Time:
>         3787 seconds total
>         2422 seconds of transactions (103 per second)
> 
> Files:
>         225064 created (59 per second)
>                 Creation alone: 100000 files (85 per second)
>                 Mixed with transactions: 125064 files (51 per second)
>         124961 read (51 per second)
>         124895 appended (51 per second)
>         225064 deleted (59 per second)
>                 Deletion alone: 100128 files (503 per second)
>                 Mixed with transactions: 124936 files (51 per second)
> 
> Data:
>         731.14 megabytes read (197.70 kilobytes per second)
>         1359.02 megabytes written (367.48 kilobytes per second)

Can we get oprofile output for these tests please?  It will give us a clue as
to how much of hot spots the ext3 atomic counters are with this benchmark.
Also, it will be nice to have results for 3-5 iterations of the test
to make sure we are looking at statistically significant numbers.

Thanks,
Kiran

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-18 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-25 13:33 [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ext2/3: Support2^32-1blocks(e2fsprogs) sho
2006-03-26 22:37 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-27  4:17   ` Takashi Sato
2006-03-27 18:45 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-27 21:10   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-27 22:58     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-28  7:15       ` Laurent Vivier
2006-03-28  8:02         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-28 10:34           ` Laurent Vivier
2006-03-28 18:01         ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-29  9:13           ` Laurent Vivier
     [not found]             ` <1143657317.4045.12.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
2006-03-29 20:00               ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-29 20:38                 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30  8:41                   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-30  1:38             ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB Mingming Cao
2006-03-30  1:54               ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-31 22:42                 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-02 20:13                   ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10  9:11                 ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10  8:24                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-13 15:26                     ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-17 21:07                       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 21:09                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-17 21:32                           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-18  7:14                             ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18  7:30                               ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-18 10:57                                 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 19:08                                   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2006-04-18 14:09                                 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 21:01                                 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-20 11:28                                   ` Laurent Vivier
     [not found]                                   ` <1145543970.5872.38.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
2006-04-21 11:17                                     ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10 16:57                   ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10 19:06                     ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-11  7:07                       ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-14 17:23                         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-30 17:36               ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:01                 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 17:40               ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:16                 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 19:22                   ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-31  6:42                     ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-31 13:33                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-01  6:50                     ` Nathan Scott
2006-05-26  5:00               ` [PATCH 0/2]Define ext3 in-kernel filesystem block types and extend " Mingming Cao
2006-05-26 18:08                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30 17:55                   ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30  1:39             ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2]ext3 block allocation/reservation fixes to support 2**32 block numbers Mingming Cao
2006-03-30  1:39             ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2]Other ext3 in-kernel block number type fix " Mingming Cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060418190829.GA3905@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=Laurent.Vivier@bull.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sho@tnes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox